|
RE: Bridging The Religious Divide (3)
You are not being frivolous at all Nanna, there is definitely something suspicious about the Pink connection, my instinct tells me so and this matter should be pursued seriously by the investigators.
But to give to get, may not be all that bad... let me make perhaps a different kind of point:
We are all motivated by something - a person lying on a couch is, even if it sounds paradoxical, motivated to do exactly that. He or she gets something from the act.
A person doing a donation - also gets something from the act. Take away the enjoyment of giving to get and you remove all the powerful human motivations for doing anything.
This couple got something (a few million perhaps), people donating got something. And to top the list, she got her pink hair - whatever drove her to such a choice.
The difference between getting more than necessary is not so serious, if it were - we would all need to cut back on our diets but we are motivated to go on mostly eating more, making more money than necessary, doing more and having more than necessary.
So the only difference between us and the pink haired lady is that some of us (including the government) feel annoyed that she had a pink hair and way more than the others. We are not that different from her but cutting her out, is to cut out something that has provided to many people something for a long time.
Just please someone - save the poor dogs, how would you feel being pushed in a pink stroller by a pink haired lady in public several times a day? Have mercy please, the crime is not in avoiding taxes and using religion as a tool for making money, those are the oldest things in the world but never have I heard anything so irresponsible and nauseating as what is happening to these dogs... truly heart-breaking.
|