Mother tongue: English Joined: April 30, 2007 Location: Germany
RE: Muscular American Feminism?
Originally written by Bertha S. Deffenbaugh on November 20, 2008 4:01 PM Anyway, most packaged foods are junk. For instance, the packaged, yucky cereals so many people have for breakfast are nothing but a dangerous pile of preservatives and additives with no nutrient content. Few people take that into consideration and keep buying them like they were going out of style.
Well now, that is something that Barack Obama could tackle - change the way Americans eat. My wife and I spent nearly 2 years in the USA, traveling about, living in hotels and eating in restaurants the whole time, and we had to leave in the end and return to Germany because the food was making us sick.
The worst thing of all was the meat. We both got chemical tenderizer rash. Even good restaurants told us that the meat was delivered to them already chemically tenderized. Eat enough of it and it tenderizes YOU!
Then there is the completely synthetic breakfast, as you say, Bertha, the cereals are dangerous. For example:
THE RAT EXPERIMENTS Paul Stitt wrote about an experiment conducted by a cereal company in which four sets of rats were given special diets. One group received plain whole wheat, water and synthetic vitamins and minerals. A second group received puffed wheat (an extruded cereal), water and the same nutrient solution. A third set was given water and white sugar. A fourth set was given nothing but water and chemical nutrients. The rats which received the whole wheat lived over a year on this diet. The rats that got nothing but water and vitamins lived about two months. The animals on a white sugar and water diet lived about a month. The company's own laboratory study showed that the rats given the vitamins, water and all the puffed wheat they wanted died within two weeks---they died before the rats that got no food at all. It wasn't a matter of the rats dying of malnutrition. Results like these suggested that there was something actually very toxic in the puffed wheat itself! Proteins are very similar to certain toxins in molecular structure, and the pressure of the puffing process may produce chemical changes, which turn a nutritious grain into a poisonous substance.
Another unpublished experiment was carried out in 1960. Researchers at Ann Arbor University were given 18 laboratory rats. They were divided into three groups: one group received corn flakes and water; a second group was given the cardboard box that the Cornflakes came in and water; the control group received rat chow and water. The rats in the control group remained in good health throughout the experiment. The rats eating the box became lethargic and eventually died of malnutrition. The rats receiving the Cornflakes and water died before the rats that were eating the box! But before death, the Cornflakes rats developed schizophrenic behaviour, threw fits, bit each other and finally went into convulsions. Autopsy revealed dysfunction of the pancreas, liver and kidneys and degeneration of the nerves of the spine, all signs of insulin shock. The startling conclusion of this study is that there was more nourishment in the box than there was in the Cornflakes. This experiment was actually designed as a joke, but the results were far from funny. The results were never published and similar studies have not been conducted. The Consumer Health Organization of Canada - http://www.consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=20011005222648
Although the cereal contains less than 3 % fat and is high in added nutrients such as 6 essential B vitamins, vitamin C, D, and iron, one of the main drawbacks in the industrial production process of such cereals is the accumulation of acrylamide - a carcinogenic chemical classified as a probable human carcinogen in 1994. This was discovered in 1950 and although the accumulation of this chemical has been reduced, so far manufacturers have failed to find a way of totally eliminating this substance from appearing in the production process. Although some other processed foods contain much higher doses of acrylamide, tests by the UK's Food Standards Agency a few years ago suggested that a serving of breakfast cereal could contribute about nine micrograms. Those eating 40 micrograms of acrylamide a day are thought to be twice as likely to get cancer of the ovary or womb as those who have lower intakes. Cereal Junk Food - part 5 (Kellogg's Corn Flakes) http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/food/kellogg-s-corn-flakes/1115646/
I just cannot figure out how you guys back there survive! But it does explain a lot about the way you all behave as a nation, by golly!
Expert Mother tongue: English Posts: 1807 Joined: February 1, 2008 Location: United States
RE: Muscular American Feminism?
Well, first of all, I don't consider the German diet all that healthy (Schnitzel, which is probably mostly transfats), Currywurst. What is in Currywurst, by the way ?? I used to eat "Currywurst mit Pommes Frites rot-weiß" while in Germany, and I don't consider that to be that healthy (particularly if you factor in all that second-hand smoke you get in a typical German restaurant !).
Plus, let's just say that America has an incredibly diverse diet and you can eat every kind of food in the world in most moderate to big cities.
Re hoping that Obama "will change the way Americans eat", I really hope that was a joke. I don't think that is the president's job, personally, to tell me how to eat (just like I would not presume to know how Obama "should eat").
Re BMI and waist measurement: I kind of disagree. I have spoken to Dr. Ken Cooper, the "founder of aerobic exercise" and he says that being cardiovascularly fit is more important than waist measurement, and he has studied this for 30 years, scientifically. I am about 15 pounds overweight, but I guarantee you I could run 10 miles right now with no problem. I know chain smokers who are rail thin, but I will put my meat-eating, beer-drinking and long-distance jogging body up against theirs in terms of overall mortality any day. Smoking is the real killer, not meat.
[Edited by John Bunch on November 20, 2008 4:04 PM]
Member Mother tongue: English Posts: 43 Joined: May 12, 2007 Location: United States
govt and food
For one, we could stop subsidizing the corn industry. Maybe there would be less high fructose corn syrup in everything if the government was not footing the bill.
Me thinks the rice cake story has gone far enough in this presidential thread, so how 'bout continuing the munching and the crunching over here Post #162483 in the RICE CAKES thread?
Expert Mother tongue: Spanish Posts: 4572 Joined: May 9, 2003 Location: United States
Adelle Davis denounced this 50 years ago!
Originally written by Derek Thornton on November 21, 2008 12:41 AM
... one of the main drawbacks in the industrial production process of such cereals is the accumulation of acrylamide - a carcinogenic chemical classified as a probable human carcinogen in 1994. This was discovered in 1950 and although the accumulation of this chemical has been reduced, so far manufacturers have failed to find a way of totally eliminating this substance from appearing in the production process.
I went to my bookshelves and reached for my favorite book on nutrition, “Let’s Get Well”, written over 50 years ago by the great Adelle Davis.
Bertha
_____________________________________
Page 336, “Let’s Get Well” by Adelle Davis
"The multibillion dollar refined-food industry has gained such power that it keeps people in ignorance and literally controls the health of our nation. Its relentless radio, television, newspaper and magazine advertising reaches like the life-crushing tentacles of an octopus into every home. Half the space in our beautiful markets is given to health-destroying products which fill shoppers’ baskets to a frightening degree. Hundreds of magazines and newspapers depending on advertising income from the foodless food industry have carried articles and syndicated columns_ clever mixtures of truth, misinformation and propaganda _ particularly designed to prevent the slightest interest in nutrition from interfering with enormous profits."
"The refined-food industry, by giving untold millions, also controls a vast amount of nutritional research. Much of it is valuable indeed, but information that might harm sales goes unreported and problems whose solution could decrease profits remain uninvestigated."
[Adelle Davis graduated from the University of California at Berkeley, took postgraduate work at Columbia University and the University of California at Los Angeles. She received her Master of Science degree in biochemistry from the University of Southern California Medical School.Later on she worked as a consulting nutritionist and planned individual diets for more than 20,000 individuals suffering from almost every known disease. She later gave up consulting work to devote her time to her family,writing and lecturing]
[Edited by Bertha S. Deffenbaugh on November 21, 2008 10:36 AM]
Expert Mother tongue: Spanish Posts: 4572 Joined: May 9, 2003 Location: United States
RE: Muscular American Feminism?
Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 1:02 AM
.. and I don't consider that to be that healthy (particularly if you factor in all that second-hand smoke you get in a typical German restaurant !).
Do Germans smoke inside a restaurant? Gee...
America has an incredibly diverse diet and you can eat every kind of food in the world in most moderate to big cities.
True. However, I would appreciate if you could give me the name of just one restaurant where I can eat *good* Chinese food. I have been to at least 5 different Chinese food restaurants until I decided to throw in the towel. The amount of fat and tendon in the chicken is close to scandalous. In Uruguay there are very good Chinese restaurants and if you happen to find the smallest bit of tendon, they will apologize and give you your money back. What is it with US Chinese restaurants?
Re hoping that Obama "will change the way Americans eat", I really hope that was a joke.
I wish Obama would mess with the way Americans eat and also with the refined-food industry, the pharmaceutical industry and the medical "industry". Someone has to put these crooks in their place.
Bertha
[Edited by Bertha S. Deffenbaugh on November 21, 2008 10:54 AM]
Member Mother tongue: English Posts: 43 Joined: May 12, 2007 Location: United States
RE: United States Presidential Election, 2008
You can get good food in the US. You have to go to a health food store or local farm, but you can.
Many people are going to starve to death and freeze to death this winter. The unemployment rate is really high, and people cannot afford to feed themselves and heat their house. I just heard on the radio yesterday that the food bank is very low.
I feel guilty eating organic when someone out there has nothing to eat at all except for what they find in a garbage can. Also in this economy I feel like I should building an emergency fund rather than spending all my money at Whole Paycheck.
I am all for getting rid of growth hormones and antibiotics in meat. I am all for getting rid of msg in our food. However, would this raise the price of our food and cause more people to go hungry?
I would like to see the free lunch program expanded to include an after school snack. Children should not be punished because their parents are unable to provide them with the basics.
Off topic posts often have the same natural flow found in real life conversation which is one of the reasons why I generally do not mind or even bother commenting on off topic posts. However...
Forums Disclaimer: The views expressed in the forums are those of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the site owner and/or moderators. If the reader considers a post to cause offence, then she or he should address a complaint to the moderator of the forum concerned. The complaint should be dealt with within 24 hours, but please respect the fact that the moderator may be living in a different time zone. Use of the forums signifies your agreement with the Forum Posting Rules.