Expert Mother tongues: English, German Posts: 7851 Joined: September 26, 2003 Location: Canada
RE: Freedom of speech, under attack in the West (Canada and France)
Perhaps an understanding of the Canadian people should precede a view of the Canadian people. But above all, a bit of sensitivity might be in order. You have just celebrated the birthday of your country. There were the usual "happy birthdays" and a bit of the feeling that the whole world celebrates this national holiday of yours. Normally I would have joined in my own good wishes. But this time round, you had previously chosen the day of my country's birthday portray it in a bad light. It wasn't even something new happening in the news. And nobody had been bombed, killed, maimed, jailed, hurt. Just an old bit of news don the day we were celebrating our country's birthday.
You have July 4. We have July 1. On July 4 you have fireworks, celebrate the birth of your country and happily receive the congratuations from the world. On July 1 it iwas our turn. We had fireworks, we celebrated, and then this here. Couldn't it have waited? On a personal level it was disappointing.
[Edited by Maxi Schwarz-Bastami on July 5, 2009 7:32 AM]
Expert Mother tongues: Polish, English Posts: 2911 Joined: September 13, 2008 Location: United States
RE: Freedom of speech,
Originally written by John Bunch on July 2, 2009 2:34 PM If so, do the Kazachstanis have the right to sue Sacha Baron Cohen before the Human Rights Commission ? Does every group parodied in that movie have such a right, because he made fun of them and subjected them to ridicule ? And what about the "Brüno" movie ? Should it be banned in Canada ?
I still believe there is not enough freedom of speech in the US, although it is in my opinion the freest place I have known. I think people should be able to say absolutely anything they want: but they should also be allowed to sue anybody for slander, if they have legitimate reasons and can prove that something is a lie said with an intention to defame.
Expert Mother tongue: English Posts: 1815 Joined: February 1, 2008 Location: United States
RE: Freedom of speech,
On this 4th of July weekend, a quote from Ben Franklin, on freedom:
"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
BTW, I did not really mean to insult Canada. But I am sometimes amazed by Canadian attitudes. I guess this might go back to the fact that Canada was settled in part by Americans who supported the "wrong side" (Britain) in the U.S. Revolutionary War), and who thus have a different attitude than Americans. But I just am sometimes astonished by Canadian attitudes. For instance, an American would not accept waiting 14 months for a "universally covered" hip replacement operation, but Canadians seem to think that that is totally o.k. and fully normal. Also, we don't like the state telling us what we can say, but evidently, the Canadians think it is totally o.k.
I am fine with Canada having a "different way". I just hope that this does not result in effects for us Americans (Islamic terrorists coming down from their "refuge" in Canada, as happened in 2000, when they tried to blow up LAX in Los Angeles).
Mother tongue: Polish Joined: February 18, 2003 Location: Poland
RE: Freedom of speech, under attack in France
Originally written by Liliana Boladz-Nekipelov on July 5, 2009 2:10 PM
I still believe there is not enough freedom of speech in the US, although it is in my opinion the freest place I have known.
People somehow forget that the French are now also free to shout "Sarkozy, I can see you!" For whatever reason I cannot find anything in English about the fact that the French just released the teacher who had been arrested for that kind of lèse majesté.
L’homme qui avait crié «Sarkozy, je te vois» à des policiers effectuant un contrôle en gare Saint-Charles en février 2008 a été relaxé, vendredi, par le tribunal de police de Marseille. Le juge de proximité qui présidait le tribunal a estimé que le «tapage injurieux diurne troublant la tranquillité d’autrui» reproché à l’auteur des propos n’était pas constitué. Pour le juge, ces paroles lancées à une heure de pointe peuvent être assimilées à la «rumeur normale» de ce type d’endroit. http://www.liberation.fr/politiques/0101577807-relaxe-pour-le-je-te-vois
Originally written by Jacek K. on July 6, 2009 11:45 AM
People somehow forget that the French are now also free to shout "Sarkozy, I can see you!" For whatever reason I cannot find anything in English about the fact that the French just released the teacher who had been arrested for that kind of lèse majesté.
At your service... Your research is probably more sophisticated than mine
"Mocking President Sarkozy can land you in trouble. The French law is being deployed with vigour against citizens who take the President's name in vain.
The latest case is a 47-year-old philosophy teacher from Marseilles university who was tried in the city's police court today for shouting in a supposedly jocular way "Sarkozy, je te vois" ('Sarkozy, I can see you' -- using the familiar singular).
The prosecutor called for conviction and a 100 euro fine against Patrick X, the lecturer, for the quaintly defined offence of "disturbance of the peace with insults, during the daytime". The lecturer, who is witholding his surname from the media, has become a bit of a celebrity over the past couple of days. Recounting his misadventure on the radio, he said that he was walking through Saint Charles station, the Marseilles rail terminus, in the evening rush-hour and came across police officers who were aggressively checking the identity of two youths. To "lighten the atmosphere", he called out "Sarkozy I can see you" and the surrounding crowd burst into laughter. The police took offence and hustled him off to the station for booking.
It was an easy hit since the name Sarkozy is synonymous with law-and-order and our professor, though wearing a suit and tie at the time, is obviously one of those leftwingers who worry about "police repression". "It was an attempt to defuse the atmosphere, a teacher's technique to relax the mood," Patrick explained on France-Inter radio today. "People laughed a lot. The police must answer the question: 'does laughter disturb the peace ? Is laughter subversive ?'"
The prosecutor said Patrick's conduct was no laughing matter. The incident had lasted for five minutes, during which, the police calculated, he could have said "Sarkozy, I can see you" up to 62 times. …
Expert Mother tongue: English Posts: 1815 Joined: February 1, 2008 Location: United States
RE: Freedom of speech, under attack in France
Evidently, any comment in favor of Hamas or Hezbollah can get one banned from entering Canada, as this video shows (see link). Beware, members of Translators Cafe, criticism of Israel is evidently enough to get you defined - in Canada - as a "national security threat" (note: I find Galloway one of the most appalling and repugnant people currently talking about politics, but I have to actually side with him here). Watch for yourself:
Expert Mother tongue: English Posts: 1815 Joined: February 1, 2008 Location: United States
RE: Freedom of speech, under attack in France
BTW, the German leftist "god" Rosa Luxembourg once said "Freiheit ist immer die Freiheit der Andersdenkenden" (freedom means the freedom of those who you disagree with). There is a long tradition of this. If you agree with a certain person or statement, there is no reason to protect it as "free speech". It is only speech that we find offensive that needs protecting. So if someone states that he or she will not allow someone to speak, who they disagree with, in effect, they are saying that they do not believe in free speech.
There is a more insidious aspect to this. For instance, I dislike George Galloway and I think that it is true that he more or less supports those groups. But is it not better to invite him in and debate it ? Wouldn't it protect Canadians more to have him in and then confront him, in an open forum, such as the TV debate above ? I hardly think that banning his views makes one stronger against those views. Probably the opposite is the case.
A lawsuit filed Friday against Macalester College charges that Jacob Bond was kicked off the football team there in 2006 for refusing to remove his helmet while the national anthem was being played -- an act he says was an act of protest over the Bush administration's war in Iraq. ...
According to the suit, the incident took place during a practice, when the national anthem was played on an adjacent field as part of a competition unrelated to the football team. Patrick Babcock, an assistant coach, told the players to remove their helmets, the suit says. Bond said that he kept his helmet on and turned away, as an act of protest....
Mother tongue: Polish Joined: February 18, 2003 Location: Poland
RE: Freedom
Meanwhile, in US provinces,
the Iraqi government moves to ban sites deemed harmful to the public, to require Internet cafes to register with the authorities and to press publishers to censor books.
The government, which has been proceeding quietly on the new censorship laws, said prohibitions were necessary because material currently available in the country had had the effect of encouraging sectarian violence in the fragile democracy and of warping the minds of the young. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/world/middleeast/04censor.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Pagkakaila sa Talakayan: Ang mga opinyon na ipinahayag sa talakayan ay opinyon ng mga may-akda at hindi tiyak na opinyon ng may-ari ng site at/o mga tagapamagitan. Kung kinukunsidera ng mambabasa na ang inilalathala ay magiging sanhi ng sama ng loob, kailangan niyang magharap ng reklamo sa kinauukulang tagapamagitan ng talakayan. Ang reklamo ay aaksyunan sa loob ng 24 oras, ngunit mangyaring igalang ang katotohanan na ang tagapamagitan ay maaaring nakatira sa ibang time zone. Ang paggamit ng mga talakayan ay nangangahulugan ng iyong pagsang-ayon sa Mga Alituntunin sa Paglalathala sa Talakayan.
Language, Literature, Arts, Religion, Other 
TC Mobile |
Forum Settings |
Log On
Reply
Quote
Edit
Delete
