| Posted: November 3, 2008 3:38 AM | Post #160223 | ||
| Jonathan Downie Mother tongue: English Posts: 845 Joined: March 9, 2008 Location: United Kingdom | Another fun poll to see how people approach language. Do you see its purpose as to allow us to communicate with others or to enable us to articulate our own ideas? Fill in the blank: The primary purpose of language is ___________________ | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 5:13 AM | Post #160231—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Chani D Mother tongues: French, German Posts: 504 Joined: July 4, 2006 Location: Spain |
I voted "both", because the purpose of language is of course communication, but before being able to communicate with others, one learns to comprehend the world and articulate his/her own ideas through language. If it were not so, there would be no linguistic imperialism. | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 5:16 AM | Post #160232—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Theo Bernards Mother tongue: Dutch Posts: 67 Joined: October 1, 2008 Location: France | Nice poll, it is fun to see what people think about language, but in my modest view language is the end result of a lengthy process of thoughts, which means neurons and signals jumping from one brain cell to the next, culminating into a more or less universal communication method. This is, in my opinion, what distinguishes mankind from other animal species, together with self-awareness and the ability to think in time lines. If this all is broken down you might argue that language is the final and ever growing result of basic elementary processes related to electricity and physics; after all, it is via our language we communicate but our language can only exist by the grace of these elementary processes. This may also lead to the conclusion that language is not an exact science but merely an approach towards communicating. A process in the mind of person A may very well lead to different words if that process is duplicated in the mind of person B. Speech and writing are the main methods of transfering thoughts from one person to another, and given the assumption that communicating in one language is prone to interference and involuntary communication barriers, it is easy to see why translation can be very easily misinterpreted, either through errors or omissions by the translator or through misinterpretating either the source text or the target language. It is, however, funny to see the universal reaction of people when they think the other party in any communication doesn't understand what is said: raise the volume, in other words: SHOUTING! This is another funny side of language, where people fail to see the difference between a clear message and a loud message. But maybe that is an interesting subject for another poll or discussion. | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 5:51 AM | Post #160235—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Maxi Schwarz-Bastami Mother tongues: English, German Posts: 7851 Joined: September 26, 2003 Location: Canada | Having seen the documentary on the mating song of a particular whale, which is based on a similar system as 12-tone compositions, including rules of variations along musical grammar, I wonder about a number of things re: the above. (Humans vs. animals, that is.) We are definitely the most adept species at miscommunication. Maxi | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 6:47 AM | Post #160241—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Marisa Paván Mother tongue: Spanish Posts: 260 Joined: April 6, 2003 Location: Argentina | Hello! Interesting poll! I've voted "both" because language is a means of communication and at the same time, it offers a framework for us to be able to express our thoughts and ideas. Regards, Marisa
| ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 6:56 AM | Post #160242—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Theo Bernards Mother tongue: Dutch Posts: 67 Joined: October 1, 2008 Location: France | Hi Maxi,
I agree with you there! Miscommunication is an almost solely human prerogative. What I meant regarding the difference between humans and other animals is the ability to communicate in conjunction with our self-awareness and our ability to think in time lines. In other words, to go against our direct instincts which are based on the 'safeguard the species'-principle. There are more examples of animals being able to communicate, think of bees, who can hum in distinct patterns recognisable for other bees, and convey messages relating to things important for bees, but I have yet to come across the first bee which doesn't sting when threatened, which for bees is a form of suicide (they normally die after stinging, I have been led to believe). This is an instinctive response. Compare that with people, who can show restraint (some better than others This is veering away from the subject of this poll but nevertheless a very interesting discussion point. | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 8:02 AM | Post #160249—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Maxi Schwarz-Bastami Mother tongues: English, German Posts: 7851 Joined: September 26, 2003 Location: Canada | Some animals have shown themselves to be self-aware. Self-restraint does exist in at least some animals. It is possible that some animals think along time lines and that some humans don't. The song of the whales is a complex melody built along a particular structure which must be remembered and improvised while keeping that structure, and that improvisation must then be sung in all "keys" (in a whale sense) without skipping any key - that being the principle of 12-tone composition (something I have not yet mastered). The pod as a whole has been developing this musical line while being followed for over a decade so that the improvisation is now on a more complex structure than when they were first being followed. This has elements at least of the language of music, which is a complex thing. | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 8:05 AM | Post #160250—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Jonathan Downie Mother tongue: English Posts: 845 Joined: March 9, 2008 Location: United Kingdom | It is really interestig to see people's philosophical and linguistic musings. Personally, I realise that language is so complex how you see it may be as much a function of your personality as it could be related to any objective factor. | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 9:30 AM | Post #160258—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Maxi Schwarz-Bastami Mother tongues: English, German Posts: 7851 Joined: September 26, 2003 Location: Canada | Or background. My parents took up farming when I reached my teens so I observed animals and interacted with them rather than just postulating about them. The story of the whales comes at a time when I am studying the structure of music so it is especially significant. | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 9:51 AM | Post #160262—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Marisa Paván Mother tongue: Spanish Posts: 260 Joined: April 6, 2003 Location: Argentina |
Dolphins can also communicate in a special way: http://www.beach-net.com/dolphins/communication.html Marisa | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 10:03 AM | Post #160263—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Theo Bernards Mother tongue: Dutch Posts: 67 Joined: October 1, 2008 Location: France | Interesting point Jonathan, about language being a part of one's personality. Hadn't thought about it in that direction, but you have a point. I see the validity in such a realisation. Same goes for you, Maxi, that language is very much part of somebody's background, although I am not sure if interacting with animals is the same as communicating with them, but that could be a semantics issue on my behalf, not a stipulation or postulation . I think the key here is that I feel communication works in both directions and I haven't had any experiences with animals expressing their thoughts towards me but then again, I am not a farmer. Your story of the whales is very interesting, I must say that I wasn't aware of the musical properties of these mammals. Since my move to France the documentary channels have changed language into French, which is not my strongest point, and I have missed out on many documentaries which I used to watch in Netherlands ans in Ireland. Which documentary was that? | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 10:13 AM | Post #160264—in reply to #160263 | ||
| Jacek K. TC Master Mother tongue: Polish Joined: February 18, 2003 Location: Poland |
Apparently, there might be some examples of the latter in the Interspecies communication thread. Here, I have voted for both... | ||
| Posted: November 3, 2008 11:29 AM | Post #160278—in reply to #160264 | ||
| Nanna Mercer Mother tongues: English, Danish Posts: 9029 Joined: February 12, 2005 Location: Denmark |
Me too! Anyway, Aria (an Alsatian) communicates in various ways: she 'snaps' her upper and lower jaw very gently in my face: supposedly she's being affectionate. When I do the same to her, she repeats the movement while looking very calm and loving. Whenever I let her out in the garden, she does an interesting parameter check: she runs alongside the fence the whole way 'round. With raised hackles and a stiff 'beware' posture, she barks as loud as she can. When she has finished the round, she stops and looks at me. I reinforce this particular communication by loudly approving. Very good! She smacks her lips loudly when I get annoyed at her. Supposedly it's a way to pacify members of the tribe: calm down, Nanna! She does the smacking lip thing with her ears pulled way back when I get very wired about the mud she drags in from the by now always wet and muddy garden. To reassure her that she has managed to calm down the alpha, I step away from her and then smack my lips in return: she relaxes, and allows me to clean her huge paws without any fuss. Nanna | ||
| Posted: November 4, 2008 7:42 AM | Post #160382—in reply to #160223 | ||
| Dodo Kaipdodo TC Master Mother tongue: Lithuanian Posts: 1549 Joined: August 8, 2007 Location: Lithuania |
The primary purpose of language in general is making simple things intricate and making intricate things inextricable. But different languages exist so that translators might land jobs. | ||
| Posted: November 4, 2008 9:13 AM | Post #160389—in reply to #160382 | ||
| Liliana Boladz-Nekipelov Mother tongues: Polish, English Posts: 2909 Joined: September 13, 2008 Location: United States | I basically think that languages are like music: like the ancient rhythm of the drum talking to you in different forms.
Liliana | ||
| Posted: November 4, 2008 10:59 AM | Post #160403—in reply to #160389 | ||
| Maxi Schwarz-Bastami Mother tongues: English, German Posts: 7851 Joined: September 26, 2003 Location: Canada |
That's music to my ears. | ||
| Posted: November 4, 2008 12:03 PM | Post #160412—in reply to #160382 | ||
| Jonathan Downie Mother tongue: English Posts: 845 Joined: March 9, 2008 Location: United Kingdom |
I love the ending to that sentence. I do sometimes wonder whether God thought to Himself, after the Tower of Babel incident, "never mind, at least now they can give money to translators and interpreters." | ||
| Posted: November 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Post #160415—in reply to #160412 | ||
| Liliana Boladz-Nekipelov Mother tongues: Polish, English Posts: 2909 Joined: September 13, 2008 Location: United States | I think He thought it was Art. | ||