Home Home Home
Home
Translation Jobs
Hide Panels
Members Log On

User Name

Password
Click to get help
Site Language
ENEnglish
Forums
You are currently browsing as a guest. Please log on to access more features.
Moderators
Jacek K., Nanna Mercer
Message format
Thread information
Last Activity November 21, 2009 9:05 AM

21 replies
1454 viewings

Site Search
Notification

Toggle e-mail notification

XML RSS Feed
Recommend Us
stumbleupon|digg|del.icio.us|reddit|facebook
Legend
Posted Messages:
5000 5000
2000 2000
1000 1000
500 500
100 100
25 25
Colour Coding:
  • Administrator
  • Forum Moderator
  • Registered User
Je ne m'exprime librement qu'avec des gens dégagés de toute opinion et placés au point de vue d'une bienveillante ironie universelle.Joseph Ernest Renan
Page: 1 2 3
Back Reply
« Thread »
Should we eliminate textbooks from schools today?

Yesterday, I linked to the following article (thank you, A.):

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says forcing California's students to rely on printed textbooks is so yesterday: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hfHxHQeOOEBGeR3_JC0Hnl_DeWyAD98O2OF00

Do you agree with his decision to use more online learning materials to gradually phase out traditional printed textbooks in schools?

To me this is a generational question and I would like to see how many dinosaurs vs. modernists we have in this discussion group.

As usual, all sorts of nuanced answers are possible (Yes, but; No, but; It depends; Yes, but not everywhere and not always; No, but yes in 7.5 years, etc.) so feel free to articulate them in your replies, especially in relation to your own (grand)children, if you have any. Has the time come?

Our previous poll, run three years ago, had a different slant. The majority replied then "When I have to read online, I tend to scan and skim" (Post #90252

The question three years later, is:

Should we eliminate textbooks from schools today?

Note the idea "starting today."  If you are for the digital in science but against it in humanities and you believe that the emphasis should be on the former, that would be the prevailing trend I am interested in. If you want to reply "Yes, but," please check "Yes." If you want to reply "No, but," please check "No." The article I linked to has some further background.

I know that this poll is unscientific, cannot prove anything, should have 97 detailed options because life is not black and white, and you simply cannot answer this question because it makes no sense whatsoever.

That's precisely why I am running this poll, as all the others before: Say it.

Option Votes
 
 

Posted:
July 6, 2009 1:11 PM
Post #179717—in reply to #179711
Nanna Mercer
Photo
Expert
500020002000
Mother tongues: English, Danish
Posts: 9022
Joined: February 12, 2005
Location: Denmark
 
RE: Should we eliminate textbooks from schools today?

Originally written by Jacek K. on July 6, 2009 5:47 PM

A scenario is actually playing out in terms of children’s books under a law meant to protect toddlers from lead contaminants in toys. Called the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), the law was passed in August 2008—quickly, without scrutiny, and nearly unanimously—in response to the Chinese lead toy scare of 2007. The act defines its mission so broadly as to cover all “children’s products,” including children’s books. ...

Politicians not only like to hug and kiss babies, they also like to be seen as doing something about things that will matter to their constituents...anything will do as long as it's profound and sweeping and saves the world or part of it...

Talk about throwing out the just hugged and kissed baby with the bathwater.

Nanna

PS: that was clearly NOT what I had in mind when I voted in this poll.



[Edited by Nanna Mercer on July 6, 2009 1:16 PM]

Reply|Quote|Edit|Delete
Posted:
July 6, 2009 1:40 PM
Post #179719—in reply to #179715
Jacek K.
TC Master
Photo
Mother tongue: Polish
Joined: February 18, 2003
Location: Poland
 
RE: Should we eliminate textbooks from schools today?

Originally written by Dodo Kaipdodo on July 6, 2009 6:35 PM

I`ve just shocked my immediate environment by turning my TV set on, and am now leaving the TC for Law and Order.

Jesus, Dodo...

I've got something better for you. Even though we have covered Ayn Rand in other threads, I just wanted to point out here that her latest editions are lead-free and thus qualify to fill any vacuum left after children's books!

What's up with all the Ayn Rand love we're seeing lately? Hasn't the boring and didactic novelist's most prominent acolyte, Alan Greenspan, been revealed as an empty suit in the wake of the financial crash? And hasn't her crassly anti-altruistic, dollar-worshiping world view been soundly dismissed as right-wing fantasy? Yet Atlas Shrugged has reappeared on bestseller lists, and Rand's muddle-headed "Objectivism" is back in the zeitgeist.

Story: http://www.utne.com/Politics/Exhuming-Ayn-Rand.aspx?utm_medium=email&utm_source=iPost


Reply|Quote|Edit|Delete
Page: 1 2 3
Back Reply
« Thread »
Home | Forums | Albums | Search
Recent threads | Today | This Week | Top 25
Forum Statistics | Who's Online | Random Quotes
New TC Mobile | Forum Settings | Log On
TranslatorsCafé.com

Site Language English | Español | More...

Copyright © ANVICA Software Development 2002—2009. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy. Terms and Conditions of Use. Use signifies your agreement.
Mail comments and suggestions to TranslatorsCafe.com webmaster
Directory of translators, interpreters and translation agencies.

Forums Disclaimer: The views expressed in the forums are those of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the site owner and/or moderators. If the reader considers a post to cause offence, then she or he should address a complaint to the moderator of the forum concerned. The complaint should be dealt with within 24 hours, but please respect the fact that the moderator may be living in a different time zone. Use of the forums signifies your agreement with the Forum Posting Rules.