Home Home Home
Home
الصفحة الرئيسيةمواضيعخدمات و معلومات مفيدةإعداداتمساعدة
إخفاء لوحات التحكم
تسجيل دخول الأعضاء

اسم المستخدم

كلمة السر
انقر للحصول على مساعدة
اختر لغة الموقع
ARArabic – العربية
المنتديات
أنت الآن تتصفح الموقع كضيف. الرجاء تسجيل الدخول لتتمكن من استخدام المزيد من الميزات المتاحة.
المشرفون
Nanna Mercer, Jacek K.
طريقة العرض
معلومات عن الموضوع
آخر نشاط 2/11/2012 00:57

602 ردود
107337 مشاهدات

البحث في الموقع
تنبيهات

تغيير طريقة التنبيه بالبريد الإلكتروني

XML RSS Feed
أخبر أصدقائك عنَّأ
 del.icio.us facebook
الدليل
المشاركات المدرجة
5000 5000
2000 2000
1000 1000
500 500
100 100
25 25
دلالة اللون:
  • مدير
  • مشرف المنتدى
  • عضو مسجَّل
Top Contributors
Past Month

L C (18)
Most Popular Threads
Past three months

Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 61

Ridiculous job offers 48

One mistake and you’re doomed?? 10

Removal of Jobs Post - Lack of contact from moderators 6

Ridiculous Jobs 6

Per favore, qualcuno è disposto a farmi una revisione?? 6

Working Pro-bono for agencies 6



Past three years

Ridiculous job offers 160

Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 61

Translating into your second language.­. A serious taboo? 25

The tag "Urgent Job" and the impression it gives about an agency 24

Is it important for a translator to have a degree in translation? 19

Payment by a counterfeit cheque 17

Proofreading not paid from an agency after bad translation 16

أشهر الرسائل
Past three months

RE: free internship as "job offer" 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 3



Past three years

Top 10 things I have learned as a freelance translator 6

RE: Ridiculous job offers 5

RE: belittling, insulting, and verbal abuse 5

The tag "Urgent Job" and the impression it gives about an agency 4

RE: belittling, insulting, and verbal abuse (OT) 4

Who’s Posting Answers on TranslatorsCafe.com/TCTerms
In the province of the mind, what one believes to be true either is true or becomes true.John Lilly
الصفحة: 158 59 60 61
عودة
« الموضوع »
تاريخ المشاركة: 20/محرم/1433 04:34 م
مشاركة رقم 238504— رد على مشاركة رقم 238274
+0-0
Jacek K.
عضو فاعل
اللغة الأم: البولندية
تاريخ الانضمام: 01/ربيع الأول/1431
مكان التواجد: بولندا
 
RE: Learning History of the Other

Originally written by Jacek K. on November 22, 2011 9:17 AM

And a gift for John:

Walesa unveils Reagan memorial in Warsaw

A statue in memory to former US President Ronald Reagan was unveiled in Warsaw's Ujazdowskie Avenue on Monday by former Polish President Lech Walesa, founder of the Solidarity Union which overthrew the communist regime in Poland.

The three-meter high stone and bronze statue, standing opposite the US embassy, is a tribute to the 40th US president for his contribution to defeating communism and thus opening way for freedom in Poland.

The monument, authored by sculptor Wladyslaw Dudek, shows Reagan during his 1987 speech at Berlin's Brandenburg Gate.

In 1989, Poland became the first nation in Eastern Europe to topple communism.

“As a participant in these events,” it was “inconceivable” that such changes would have come about without the last American president during the post-1945 cold-war era, Walesa said at the ceremony, as quoted by the Polish radio.

To follow up:

10 Responses to “President Ronald Reagan Centennial and Poland – A reflection on 21 years.”

 http://polandian.home.pl/index.php/2011/12/14/president-ronald-reagan-centennial-and-poland-%e2%80%93-a-reflection-on-21-years/


إضافة رد |اقتباس |تعديل |حذف
تاريخ المشاركة: 19/صفر/1433 10:05 ص
مشاركة رقم 240225— رد على مشاركة رقم 219417
+0-0
Jacek K.
عضو فاعل
اللغة الأم: البولندية
تاريخ الانضمام: 01/ربيع الأول/1431
مكان التواجد: بولندا
 
RE: Learning History of the Other

Originally written by Jacek K. on March 17, 2011 9:20 AM

Originally written by J. K. on September 14, 2006 4:34 PM in Post #97955

I am not saying that Jaruzelski was worse than any other general. It was his job to kill so kill he did:

- In 1968, during the Prague Spring, he led the Polish military participation in the invasion of Czechoslovakia; (Yes, I know, it was "necessary." )
- In 1970, "He is suspected of taking part in the organization of the execution of striking workers, which led to a massacre in the coastal cities of Gdańsk, Gdynia, Elbląg and Szczecin." (Wikipedia) (Yes, I know, it was "necessary." )
- On 13th December 1981 Jaruzelski imposed martial law, which was again "necessary."

Somehow, I and many others survived all those years without "necessarily" having to kill and hold AN ABSOLUTE POWER in a totalitarian state.

 

Martial Law illegal, Tribunal rules

Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal has ruled that two decrees connected with the introduction of Martial Law by the communist Council of State in 1981 were inconsistent with the constitution. ...

As a result of the imposition of Martial Law in December 1981, thousands were imprisoned and approximately 100 killed.

The period lasted until July 1983, with detainment regularly enforced for those who broke the curfew or engaged in what was deemed to be an illegal gathering.

Countless Poles lost their jobs as a result of the upheaval. Many Solidarity activists were not released from prison until as late as 1986.

Nevertheless, Poland’s last communist leader, General Jaruzelski, has always claimed that the crackdown was the lesser of two evils, and that it deflected a Moscow-backed invasion. ...

http://www.thenews.pl/national/artykul151372_martial-law-illegal--tribunal-rules.html

Martial law, which helped keep Polish communists in power for another eight years in the 1980s, was imposed by "an armed criminal group," said the Warsaw court, expressing after 30 years an opinion different from that of the communist generals.

The Warsaw Provincial Court found the former Polish interior minister retired Gen. Czeslaw Kiszczak guilty and gave him a two-year-suspended prison term for his role in implementing martial law in Poland in 1981.Kiszczak, was sentenced in absentia.

Another defendant, former secretary general of Communist Party (PZPR) Stanislaw Kania, appeared in the Warsaw court but was found not guilty.

The two had been accused of forming an armed criminal group conspiring to impose martial law. They both denied the charges.
The court found out that Kania had resigned as first secretary of PZPR months before martial law was declared.

Martial law was proclaimed by Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski on Dec. 13, 1981 in an attempt to crush the nationwide Solidarity freedom movement. Thousands of political opponents were imprisoned and as many as 100 people lost their lives over an 18-month period.

Jaruzelski was also put on trial for his role in the crackdown but escaped prosecution due to ill health. He is suffering from cancer.  http://www.warsawvoice.pl/WVpage/pages/article.php/19466/news


إضافة رد |اقتباس |تعديل |حذف
تاريخ المشاركة: 19/صفر/1433 10:12 ص
مشاركة رقم 240226— رد على مشاركة رقم 240225
+0-0
John Bunch
Photo
Expert
5000100100100252525
اللغة الأم: الإنجليزية
عدد المشاركات: 5379
32
تاريخ الانضمام: 23/محرم/1429
مكان التواجد: ألمانيا
 
RE: Learning History of the Other

How a Soviet officer saved the world from a nuclear war (he should get the Nobel Peace Prize, because he is a a hero):

 

 

Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov (RussianСтанислав Евграфович Петров; born c. 1939) is a retired lieutenant colonel of the Soviet Air Defence Forces. On September 26, 1983 he was the duty officer at the command center for the Oko nuclear early warning system when the system reported a small launch from the United States. Petrov judged that the report was a false alarm.[1] This decision may have prevented an erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its Western allies. Investigation later confirmed that the satellite warning system had malfunctioned.[2][edit]

The Incident

There are questions over the part Petrov's decision played in preventing nuclear war, because, according to the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation, nuclear retaliation is based on multiple sources that confirm an actual attack.[3] The incident, however, exposed a flaw in the Soviet early warning system. Petrov asserts that he was neither rewarded nor punished for his actions.[4]

Had Petrov reported incoming American missiles, his superiors might have launched an assault against the United States, precipitating a corresponding nuclear response from the United States. Petrov declared the system's indications a false alarm. Later, it was apparent that he was right: no missiles were approaching and the computer detection system was malfunctioning. It was subsequently determined that the false alarms had been created by a rare alignment of sunlight on high-altitude clouds and the satellites' Molniya orbits, an error later corrected by cross-referencing a geostationary satellite.[5]

Petrov later indicated the influences in this decision included: that he was informed a U.S. strike would be all-out, so five missiles seemed an illogical start,[1] that the launch detection system was new and, in his view, not yet wholly trustworthy, and that ground radars failed to pick up corroborative evidence, even after minutes of delay.[6]

Petrov underwent intense questioning by his superiors about his actions. Initially, he was praised for his decision.[1] Gen. Yury Votintsev, then commander of the Soviet Air Defense's Missile Defense Units, who was the first to hear Petrov's report of the incident (and the first to reveal it to the public in the 1990s), states that Petrov's "correct actions" were "duly noted."[1] Petrov himself states he was initially praised by Votintsev and was promised a reward,[1][7] but recalls that he was also reprimanded for improper filing of paperwork with the pretext he had not described the incident in the military diary.[7][8]

He received no reward. According to Petrov, this was because the incident and other bugs that were found in the missile detection system embarrassed his superiors and the influential scientists who were responsible for the system, so that if he had been officially rewarded, they would have had to be punished.[1][4][7][8] He was reassigned to a less sensitive post,[8] took early retirement (although he emphasizes that he was not "forced out" of the army, as the case is presented by some Western sources),[7] and suffered a nervous breakdown.[8]

The incident involving Petrov became known publicly in the 1990s following the publication of Gen. Votintsev's memoirs. Widespread media reports since then have increased public awareness of Petrov's actions.

There is occasionally some confusion as to precisely what Petrov's military role was in this incident. Petrov, as an individual, was not in a position where he could have single-handedly launched any of the Soviet missile arsenal. Instead Petrov's sole duty was to monitor satellite surveillance equipment and report missile attack warnings up the chain of command where, ultimately, the top Soviet leadership would have decided whether to launch a "retaliatory" attack against the West. Whether to launch an attack was not Petrov's decision to make. His role, however, was crucial in the process of making that decision.[9] According to Bruce Blair, a Cold War nuclear strategies expert and nuclear disarmament advocate, formerly with the Center for Defense Information, "The top leadership, given only a couple of minutes to decide, told that an attack had been launched, would make a decision to retaliate."[10]

[edit]Awards, commendations

Petrov is now a pensioner, spending his retirement in the town of Fryazino, Russia.[11] On May 21, 2004, the San Francisco-based Association of World Citizens gave Petrov its World Citizen Award along with a trophy and $1000 "in recognition of the part he played in averting a catastrophe."[12]

In January 2006, Petrov traveled to the United States where he was honored in a meeting at the United Nations in New York City. There the Association of World Citizens presented Petrov with a second special World Citizen Award.[13] The following day, Petrov met with American journalist Walter Cronkite at his CBS office in New York City. That interview, in addition to other highlights of Petrov's trip to the United States, are expected to be included in the documentary film The Man Who Saved the World.[12][dated info][14]

On the same day that Petrov was honored at the United Nations in New York City, the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations issued a press release contending that a single individual would be incapable of starting or preventing a nuclear war, stating in part: "Under no circumstances a decision to use nuclear weapons could be made or even considered in the Soviet Union (Russia) or in the United States on the basis of data from a single source or a system. For this to happen, a confirmation is necessary from several systems: ground-based radars, early warning satellites, intelligence reports, etc."[3]

Petrov has said he does not regard himself as a hero for what he did that day. In an interview for the documentary film The Red Button and the Man Who Saved the World,[15] Petrov says, "All that happened didn't matter to me — it was my job. I was simply doing my job, and I was the right person at the right time, that's all. My late wife for 10 years knew nothing about it. 'So what did you do?' she asked me. I did nothing."

The false nuclear attack warning involving Stanislav Petrov, however, is cited by CIA analyst Peter Pry as "the single most dangerous incident of the early 1980s."


إضافة رد |اقتباس |تعديل |حذف
الصفحة: 158 59 60 61
عودة
« الموضوع »
الصفحة الرئيسية | منتديات | بحث
مواضيع جديدة | مواضيع اليوم | مواضيع الأسبوع | أنشط 25 موضوع
إحصائيات المنتدى | المتواجدون حالياً | اقتباسات عشوائية
New تيرمز كافيه على هاتفك المتحرك | إعدادات المنتدى | تسجيل الدخول
TranslatorsCafé.com

اختر لغة الموقع English | Spanish – Español | French – Français | Italian – Italiano | ....المزيد | خريطة الموقع

حقوق النشر ANVICA Software Development 2002—2012. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.
سياسة الخصوصية. شروط الاستخدام وبنوده . الاستخدام يعني موافقتك عليها.
أرسل تعليقك واقتراحاتك إلى مدير موقع TranslatorsCafe.com
دليل المترجمين والمترجمين الفوريين ووكالات الترجمة.

إبراء ذمة المنتدى: وجهات النظر الواردة في المنتديات تعبر عن وجهات نظر مؤلفيها وليست بالضرورة وجهات نظر مالك الموقع و/أو المشرفين. إذا اعتبر القارئ أن مشاركة ما تشكل إساءة، فيتعين عليه/ا تقديم شكوى لمشرف المنتدى المعني. يتم التعامل مع الشكوى خلال 24 ساعة، ولكن يرجى مراعاة أن المشرف قد يقطن في منطقة زمنية مختلفة. استخدام المنتديات يجسد موافقتك على قواعد نشر المنتدى.