Home Home Home
Home
InicioHilosInformación y ServiciosConfiguracionesAyuda
Ocultar Paneles
Ingreso de Miembros

Nombre de usuario

Contraseña
Presione para obtener ayuda
Seleccionar el idioma del sitio
ESSpanish – Español
Foros
Usted está navegando como invitado. Por favor ingrese para tener acceso a más funciones.
Moderadores
Nanna Mercer, Jacek K.
Formato del mensaje
Información sobre el hilo
Última Actividad 2/10/2012 04:48

1011 respuestas
123018 vistas

Búsqueda en el Sitio
Notificación

Activar notificaciones por correo electrónico

XML RSS Feed
Recomiéndenos
 del.icio.us facebook
Leyenda
Mensajes publicados:
5000 5000
2000 2000
1000 1000
500 500
100 100
25 25
Código de Colores
  • Administrador
  • Moderador del Foro
  • Usuario Registrado
Principales contribuyentes
Mes anterior

L C (17)
Los Hilos más Populares
Los Tres Meses Pasados

Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 61

Ridiculous job offers 40

One mistake and you’re doomed?? 10

Removal of Jobs Post - Lack of contact from moderators 6

Ridiculous Jobs 6

Per favore, qualcuno è disposto a farmi una revisione?? 6

Working Pro-bono for agencies 6



Los tres últimos años

Ridiculous job offers 152

Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 61

Translating into your second language.­. A serious taboo? 25

The tag "Urgent Job" and the impression it gives about an agency 24

Is it important for a translator to have a degree in translation? 19

Payment by a counterfeit cheque 17

Proofreading not paid from an agency after bad translation 16

Los Mensajes más Populares
Los Tres Meses Pasados

RE: free internship as "job offer" 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 3



Los tres últimos años

Top 10 things I have learned as a freelance translator 6

RE: Ridiculous job offers 5

RE: belittling, insulting, and verbal abuse 5

The tag "Urgent Job" and the impression it gives about an agency 4

RE: belittling, insulting, and verbal abuse (OT) 4

Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.Author unknown
Página: 133 34 35 36 37 38 39102
Regresar
Publicado:
viernes, 21 de noviembre de 2008 1:37
Mensaje #162516-en respuesta a #162497
+0-0
John Bunch
Photo
Expert
5000100100100252525
Lengua materna: Inglés
Mensajes:5379
32
Se inscribió el: viernes, 01 de febrero de 2008
Ubicación: Alemania
 
RE: Economy
How about an immediate recovery ? 
Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 21 de noviembre de 2008 11:06
Mensaje #162586-en respuesta a #162516
+0-0
David Kallans
Photo
Expert
10005001001002525
Lengua materna: Inglés
Mensajes:1752
2
Se inscribió el: viernes, 13 de abril de 2007
Ubicación: Estados Unidos
 
RE: Economy

Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 1:37 AM
How about an immediate recovery ? 

This would seem rather unrealistic, and perhaps even undesireable, if the quick recovery is accomplished by continuing to mortgage other generations.


Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 21 de noviembre de 2008 11:14
Mensaje #162588-en respuesta a #162516
+0-0
J. K.
Photo
Lengua materna: Polaco
Se inscribió el: martes, 18 de febrero de 2003
Ubicación: Polonia

(removed) 
RE: Economy

Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 7:37 AM
How about an immediate recovery ? 

Through prayer?

Joseph E. Stiglitz, Nobel Prize laureate in economics, reflects in the business daily Világgazdaság on the global economic crisis. "The world is sinking into an economic crisis that will probably be the worst in the past 25 years, perhaps even the worst since the Great Depression of 1929. In many respects this crisis was 'Made in America'. ... Those who even before the crisis had major trade deficits and high state debts will suffer more than others. States that haven't fully liberalised their capital and financial markets, like China, will be thankful that they didn't give in to pressure from the US Federal Reserve. ... The old institutions recognised the need for reform but they moved at a snail's pace. They did nothing to prevent the current crisis. Then there's the question of how effectively the response of these institutions will be. ... After the Great Depression it took 15 years and a World War for the world to start working as a team and dealing with the weaknesses of the global financial system that had contributed to the crisis. We can only hope that this time it won't take that long: In view of the deeply interwoven nature of the global economy the cost would simply be too high. ... It has become clear that the economic doctrines on which the current Bretton Woods institutions [the World Bank, International Monetary Fund] are based have failed not only in the developing countries, but also in the core countries of capitalism."
Világgazdaság (Hungary)

http://europe.courrierinternational.com/eurotopics/article.asp?langue=uk&publication=20/11/2008&cat=REFLECTIONS&pi=0#0


Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 21 de noviembre de 2008 12:59
Mensaje #162621-en respuesta a #162588
+0-0
John Bunch
Photo
Expert
5000100100100252525
Lengua materna: Inglés
Mensajes:5379
32
Se inscribió el: viernes, 01 de febrero de 2008
Ubicación: Alemania
 
RE: Economy
Well, it will continue to be bad if they (government) continue to cover any transparency that there might be in the system as to who owns what. It seems like lack of transparency is to me the main issue (example: I am buying a securitized asset, but how do I know what it is worth ?). This is partly the fault of the private sector and banks who intentionally made such securities über-complex so that only they and their PhDs in math could understand them. And many of the most intelligent people in the world STILL don't understand them and what they are worth. 

Another problem is "mark to market accounting", which is another rule that means that assets held show a lower value in accounting terms than they are really worth. 

The notion that "people should be able to stay in their homes" is misleading. I rent an apartment, but I don't consider it "mine". A house is only "yours" if you can make the payments. The politicians talking this nonsense are just making things worse. In future, people will be more reluctant to sell someone a home if the government backs that person as saying that the house is "theirs", regardless of the ability to pay for it. 

Keynesianism - the U.S. government now wants to use old, failed Keynesian "solutions" to solve this problem. The problem is, though, that these "solutions" of giving people more money and letting the economy grow "from the ground up" has been shown not to work. Many times, people sit on the money. That is what the "stimulus check" from Bush was about, by the way. The better solution would be a monetary solution of making the overall business climate better (lower taxes and regulations on business). This worked in 1982-83 to stimulate the biggest world economic expansion of all time, which literally brought 1 billion people out of abject poverty. Monetarism is not the problem, but the solution. When I hear Obama talk Keynesianism, I think, "uh oh". 

And now they are taking it one step further and talking about FDR-era public works projects to inject money in the old-fashioned Keynesian way. The problem is, by the time such projects are done, the world is in a different situation, because they take so long. Read about the "Big Dig" in Boston some time and what a waste it was and how over-budget it was. 


[Editado por John Bunch el día viernes, 21 de noviembre de 2008 13:00]

Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
martes, 25 de noviembre de 2008 9:49
Mensaje #162986-en respuesta a #162621
+0-0
J. K.
Photo
Lengua materna: Polaco
Se inscribió el: martes, 18 de febrero de 2003
Ubicación: Polonia

(removed) 
RE: Economy

Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 6:59 PM
I am buying a securitized asset, but how do I know what it is worth ?

Generally, in the world of speculators, you don't know. Look at these two pieces of news from the Warsaw Stock Exchange from the last couple of days:

1) Poland’s financial industry regulator on Friday informed the prosecutor’s office about a possible case of market manipulation involving a person acting in the name of JPMorgan Securities.

The complaint stems from the unusual end to trading on the Warsaw stock exchange on November 12. The market’s blue-chip WIG20 index had slumped by 9.1 per cent during the day, but minutes before the session’s close a series of buy orders worth 130m zlotys ($42m, €34m, £28m) were executed on all the companies making up the index, driving the WIG20 sharply upwards.

It ended the day down 4.93 per cent, and would have closed even higher had the exchange’s circuit breakers designed to dampen wild swings in prices not gone into effect.

“Transactions on the account of JPMorgan Securities could have led investors into error,” said a statement from the Financial Supervision Authority. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fa13dd40-b7f1-11dd-ac6d-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1

<script language=Java­Script type=text/Java­Script>function floatContent(){}
2) Polish oil refiner Lotos denied Monday it is facing bankruptcy as it sought to calm investors unnerved by a Unicredit analyst report which said the company is likely to collapse.

Grupa Lotos SA, Poland's second-largest crude oil refiner, said the UniCredit recommendation, released Friday, to sell the company's stock was "entirely without foundation."

On Monday, shares fell 20 percent at the start of the trading session, but recovered to close down only 6 percent at 12.72 zlotys ($4.05), company spokesman Marcin Zachowicz said.

The Polish news agency PAP said the UniCredit report warned that Lotos has only about a 50 percent chance of surviving in its current form. UniCredit also reportedly slashed its target price for Lotos to zero from 25 zlotys ($8.08). http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-ap-eu-poland-lotos,0,1458118.story
When you are in the market for shares and minutes before the closing bell someone throws on that market $42 million worth of purchase orders, how much are your target shares worth?
 
And when an analyst issues a report slashing its target price for certain oil stocks you own down to zero (!), how much are they worth?
 
I guess the answer has invariably been: Whatever people are ready to pay...
 
Jacek

Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
martes, 25 de noviembre de 2008 9:54
Mensaje #162987-en respuesta a #162986
+0-0
J. K.
Photo
Lengua materna: Polaco
Se inscribió el: martes, 18 de febrero de 2003
Ubicación: Polonia

(removed) 
RE: Economy

Y'all cheer up! It's Thanksgiving week!

Take part in the usual New Yorker caption contest:

Entries for Contest #171, drawn by Gahan Wilson, will be accepted through Sunday, November 30th.

Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 28 de noviembre de 2008 2:34
Mensaje #163242-en respuesta a #51970
+0-0
Abdelouadoud El Omrani
TC Máster
Photo
Expert
200010025
Lenguas maternas: Árabe, Francés
Mensajes:2127
Se inscribió el: miércoles, 05 de febrero de 2003
Ubicación: Qatar
 
Christian Science Monitor reporting about Islamic Finance in Britain

The land of Adam Smith now teems with a vibrant Islamic banking sector, with even non-Muslims being lured by the model's promise of transparency and stability.

'No interest' gains interest with British Muslims

By Peter Ford | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

By Ben Quinn | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
from the November 28, 2008 edition

London - Shabaz Bhatti is proud to be a devout Muslim – but his plans to remortgage the family home with one of Britain's new generation of Islamic banks isn't just about religion.

The 30-something driving instructor wants reliability, and believes Britain's growing Islamic finance sector offers this in a way that myriad traditional main street banks no longer do.

Excerpts from: http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0921/p01s04-woeu.html

and http://teamsugar.com/group/1950914/blog/2541301

Salaam

Ouadoud


Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 28 de noviembre de 2008 3:07
Mensaje #163245-en respuesta a #163242
+0-0
Shiong-Fong Lew
Photo
Lengua materna: Inglés
Se inscribió el: domingo, 28 de marzo de 2004
Ubicación: Malasia
 
RE: Christian Science Monitor reporting about Islamic Finance in Britain
Originally written by Abdelouadoud El Omrani on November 28, 2008 3:34 PM

The land of Adam Smith now teems with a vibrant Islamic banking sector, with even non-Muslims being lured by the model's promise of transparency and stability.

 

I suppose that it's still a willing buyer and willing seller basis. Adam Smith dealt with supply and demand. If there are potential profits to be made out of the Islmaic banking segment, I suppose the banks would consider coming out with the products especially with the Arabs filled up with oil money in recent years.

 

Anyway, I don't suppose the "administrative fee" would be the same for a 100K house and that of a 200K house?

Islamic principles aside (which I'm not interested in questioning), would there be added cost in the title transfer?


Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 28 de noviembre de 2008 6:08
Mensaje #163254-en respuesta a #51970
+0-0
Abdelouadoud El Omrani
TC Máster
Photo
Expert
200010025
Lenguas maternas: Árabe, Francés
Mensajes:2127
Se inscribió el: miércoles, 05 de febrero de 2003
Ubicación: Qatar
 
RE: Economy
I don't think administrative fees are significant. The banker in the islamic principles is a business entity, a trader. One of its most used tools is Murabaha.

Simplified explanations:
You need a loan to buy a car or a house. The bank buys it and then sells it to you. it makes profit out of material assests, not out of renting or leasing money itsef, since Islamic principles state that money does not produce money by itsef.

You need cash. the bank studies your refunding capacity (mainly the salary, it needs fixed guaranteed income). It may then buy stocks for you (you decide which ones) and it sells them to you. Once you have the stocks, you sell them immediately and you have cash. You pay back in comfortable monthly payments.

There are other tools of course used in Islamic finance, as Islamic insurance for example called Takaful.

Salaam,
Ouadoud



Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Publicado:
viernes, 28 de noviembre de 2008 7:27
Mensaje #163265-en respuesta a #163254
+0-0
Shiong-Fong Lew
Photo
Lengua materna: Inglés
Se inscribió el: domingo, 28 de marzo de 2004
Ubicación: Malasia
 
RE: Economy

Originally written by Abdelouadoud El Omrani on November 28, 2008 7:08 PM


You need cash. the bank studies your refunding capacity (mainly the salary, it needs fixed guaranteed income). It may then buy stocks for you (you decide which ones) and it sells them to you. Once you have the stocks, you sell them immediately and you have cash. You pay back in comfortable monthly payments.

 

Shall I assume that the profit sharing ratio had been decided in advance as the asset had already changed hands so that the scheduled payments would not change in a falling interest rate environment (such as presently on a global basis)? Thus the borrower would not have the shceduled repayment reduced, just as not having the repayment increased in a rising interest rate environment?


Responder |Citar |Editar |Borrar
Página: 133 34 35 36 37 38 39102
Regresar
Inicio | Foros | Búsqueda
Hilos Recientes | Hoy | Esta Semana | 25 Principales
Estadísticas del Foro | Quién está en línea | Citas Aleatorias
New TC Móvil | Configuraciones del Foro | Ingresar
TranslatorsCafé.com

Seleccionar el idioma del sitio English | Spanish – Español | French – Français | Italian – Italiano | Ver más... | Mapa del sitio

Copyright © ANVICA Software Development 2002—2012. Todos los derechos reservados.
Política de Privacidad. Términos y Condiciones de Uso. El uso de este sitio da por hecho la aceptación de estos términos y condiciones por parte del usuario.
Comentarios y sugerencias por correo electrónico a TranslatorsCafe.com webmaster
Directorio de traductores, intérpretes y agencias de traducción.

Excención de Responsabilidad de los Foros: Las opiniones expresadas en los foros son exclusivamente de los autores y no son necesariamente las opiniones del dueño del sitio y/o de los moderadores. Si el lector considera que una publicación le ha ofendido, entonces debe dirigir una queja al moderador del foro respectivo. Ésta debería ser resuelta dentro de las 24 horas, pero comprenda el hecho de que el moderador puede estar viviendo en una zona horaria diferente. El uso de los foros significa su acuerdo con las Reglas de Publicación del Foro.