Home Home Home
Home
HomeThreadsInfo & ServicesSettingsHelp
Hide Panels
Members Log On

User Name

Password
Click to get help
Site Language
ENEnglish
Forums
You are currently browsing as a guest. Please log on to access more features.
Moderators
Nanna Mercer, Jacek K.
Message format
Thread information
Last Activity 2/10/2012 04:48

1011 replies
123014 viewings

Site Search
Notification

Toggle e-mail notification

XML RSS Feed
Recommend Us
 del.icio.us facebook
Legend
Posted Messages:
5000 5000
2000 2000
1000 1000
500 500
100 100
25 25
Colour Coding:
  • Administrator
  • Forum Moderator
  • Registered User
Top Contributors
Past Month

L C (17)
Most Popular Threads
Past three months

Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 61

Ridiculous job offers 40

One mistake and you’re doomed?? 10

Removal of Jobs Post - Lack of contact from moderators 6

Ridiculous Jobs 6

Per favore, qualcuno è disposto a farmi una revisione?? 6

Working Pro-bono for agencies 6



Past three years

Ridiculous job offers 152

Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 61

Translating into your second language.­. A serious taboo? 25

The tag "Urgent Job" and the impression it gives about an agency 24

Is it important for a translator to have a degree in translation? 19

Payment by a counterfeit cheque 17

Proofreading not paid from an agency after bad translation 16

Most Popular Messages
Past three months

RE: free internship as "job offer" 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 4

RE: Unpaid internship: shameful slavery or invaluable experience? 3



Past three years

Top 10 things I have learned as a freelance translator 6

RE: Ridiculous job offers 5

RE: belittling, insulting, and verbal abuse 5

The tag "Urgent Job" and the impression it gives about an agency 4

RE: belittling, insulting, and verbal abuse (OT) 4

Top Translation Agencies
Well I fooled you, I fooled you, I got pig-iron, I got pig-iron, I got all pig-iron.Johnny Cash
Page: 133 34 35 36 37 38 39102
Back
« Thread »
Posted:
Friday, November 21, 2008 01:37 GMT
Post #162516—in reply to #162497
+0-0
John Bunch
Photo
Expert
5000100100100252525
Mother tongue: English
Posts: 5379
32
Joined: Friday, February 01, 2008
Location: Germany
 
RE: Economy
How about an immediate recovery ? 
Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 21, 2008 11:06 GMT
Post #162586—in reply to #162516
+0-0
David Kallans
Photo
Expert
10005001001002525
Mother tongue: English
Posts: 1752
2
Joined: Friday, April 13, 2007
Location: United States
 
RE: Economy

Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 1:37 AM
How about an immediate recovery ? 

This would seem rather unrealistic, and perhaps even undesireable, if the quick recovery is accomplished by continuing to mortgage other generations.


Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 21, 2008 11:14 GMT
Post #162588—in reply to #162516
+0-0
J. K.
Photo
Mother tongue: Polish
Joined: Tuesday, February 18, 2003
Location: Poland

(removed) 
RE: Economy

Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 7:37 AM
How about an immediate recovery ? 

Through prayer?

Joseph E. Stiglitz, Nobel Prize laureate in economics, reflects in the business daily Világgazdaság on the global economic crisis. "The world is sinking into an economic crisis that will probably be the worst in the past 25 years, perhaps even the worst since the Great Depression of 1929. In many respects this crisis was 'Made in America'. ... Those who even before the crisis had major trade deficits and high state debts will suffer more than others. States that haven't fully liberalised their capital and financial markets, like China, will be thankful that they didn't give in to pressure from the US Federal Reserve. ... The old institutions recognised the need for reform but they moved at a snail's pace. They did nothing to prevent the current crisis. Then there's the question of how effectively the response of these institutions will be. ... After the Great Depression it took 15 years and a World War for the world to start working as a team and dealing with the weaknesses of the global financial system that had contributed to the crisis. We can only hope that this time it won't take that long: In view of the deeply interwoven nature of the global economy the cost would simply be too high. ... It has become clear that the economic doctrines on which the current Bretton Woods institutions [the World Bank, International Monetary Fund] are based have failed not only in the developing countries, but also in the core countries of capitalism."
Világgazdaság (Hungary)

http://europe.courrierinternational.com/eurotopics/article.asp?langue=uk&publication=20/11/2008&cat=REFLECTIONS&pi=0#0


Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 21, 2008 12:59 GMT
Post #162621—in reply to #162588
+0-0
John Bunch
Photo
Expert
5000100100100252525
Mother tongue: English
Posts: 5379
32
Joined: Friday, February 01, 2008
Location: Germany
 
RE: Economy
Well, it will continue to be bad if they (government) continue to cover any transparency that there might be in the system as to who owns what. It seems like lack of transparency is to me the main issue (example: I am buying a securitized asset, but how do I know what it is worth ?). This is partly the fault of the private sector and banks who intentionally made such securities über-complex so that only they and their PhDs in math could understand them. And many of the most intelligent people in the world STILL don't understand them and what they are worth. 

Another problem is "mark to market accounting", which is another rule that means that assets held show a lower value in accounting terms than they are really worth. 

The notion that "people should be able to stay in their homes" is misleading. I rent an apartment, but I don't consider it "mine". A house is only "yours" if you can make the payments. The politicians talking this nonsense are just making things worse. In future, people will be more reluctant to sell someone a home if the government backs that person as saying that the house is "theirs", regardless of the ability to pay for it. 

Keynesianism - the U.S. government now wants to use old, failed Keynesian "solutions" to solve this problem. The problem is, though, that these "solutions" of giving people more money and letting the economy grow "from the ground up" has been shown not to work. Many times, people sit on the money. That is what the "stimulus check" from Bush was about, by the way. The better solution would be a monetary solution of making the overall business climate better (lower taxes and regulations on business). This worked in 1982-83 to stimulate the biggest world economic expansion of all time, which literally brought 1 billion people out of abject poverty. Monetarism is not the problem, but the solution. When I hear Obama talk Keynesianism, I think, "uh oh". 

And now they are taking it one step further and talking about FDR-era public works projects to inject money in the old-fashioned Keynesian way. The problem is, by the time such projects are done, the world is in a different situation, because they take so long. Read about the "Big Dig" in Boston some time and what a waste it was and how over-budget it was. 


[Edited by John Bunch on Friday, November 21, 2008 13:00]

Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 09:49 GMT
Post #162986—in reply to #162621
+0-0
J. K.
Photo
Mother tongue: Polish
Joined: Tuesday, February 18, 2003
Location: Poland

(removed) 
RE: Economy

Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 6:59 PM
I am buying a securitized asset, but how do I know what it is worth ?

Generally, in the world of speculators, you don't know. Look at these two pieces of news from the Warsaw Stock Exchange from the last couple of days:

1) Poland’s financial industry regulator on Friday informed the prosecutor’s office about a possible case of market manipulation involving a person acting in the name of JPMorgan Securities.

The complaint stems from the unusual end to trading on the Warsaw stock exchange on November 12. The market’s blue-chip WIG20 index had slumped by 9.1 per cent during the day, but minutes before the session’s close a series of buy orders worth 130m zlotys ($42m, €34m, £28m) were executed on all the companies making up the index, driving the WIG20 sharply upwards.

It ended the day down 4.93 per cent, and would have closed even higher had the exchange’s circuit breakers designed to dampen wild swings in prices not gone into effect.

“Transactions on the account of JPMorgan Securities could have led investors into error,” said a statement from the Financial Supervision Authority. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fa13dd40-b7f1-11dd-ac6d-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1

<script language=Java­Script type=text/Java­Script>function floatContent(){}
2) Polish oil refiner Lotos denied Monday it is facing bankruptcy as it sought to calm investors unnerved by a Unicredit analyst report which said the company is likely to collapse.

Grupa Lotos SA, Poland's second-largest crude oil refiner, said the UniCredit recommendation, released Friday, to sell the company's stock was "entirely without foundation."

On Monday, shares fell 20 percent at the start of the trading session, but recovered to close down only 6 percent at 12.72 zlotys ($4.05), company spokesman Marcin Zachowicz said.

The Polish news agency PAP said the UniCredit report warned that Lotos has only about a 50 percent chance of surviving in its current form. UniCredit also reportedly slashed its target price for Lotos to zero from 25 zlotys ($8.08). http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-ap-eu-poland-lotos,0,1458118.story
When you are in the market for shares and minutes before the closing bell someone throws on that market $42 million worth of purchase orders, how much are your target shares worth?
 
And when an analyst issues a report slashing its target price for certain oil stocks you own down to zero (!), how much are they worth?
 
I guess the answer has invariably been: Whatever people are ready to pay...
 
Jacek

Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 09:54 GMT
Post #162987—in reply to #162986
+0-0
J. K.
Photo
Mother tongue: Polish
Joined: Tuesday, February 18, 2003
Location: Poland

(removed) 
RE: Economy

Y'all cheer up! It's Thanksgiving week!

Take part in the usual New Yorker caption contest:

Entries for Contest #171, drawn by Gahan Wilson, will be accepted through Sunday, November 30th.

Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 28, 2008 02:34 GMT
Post #163242—in reply to #51970
+0-0
Abdelouadoud El Omrani
TC Master
Photo
Expert
200010025
Mother tongues: Arabic, French
Posts: 2127
Joined: Wednesday, February 05, 2003
Location: Qatar
 
Christian Science Monitor reporting about Islamic Finance in Britain

The land of Adam Smith now teems with a vibrant Islamic banking sector, with even non-Muslims being lured by the model's promise of transparency and stability.

'No interest' gains interest with British Muslims

By Peter Ford | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

By Ben Quinn | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
from the November 28, 2008 edition

London - Shabaz Bhatti is proud to be a devout Muslim – but his plans to remortgage the family home with one of Britain's new generation of Islamic banks isn't just about religion.

The 30-something driving instructor wants reliability, and believes Britain's growing Islamic finance sector offers this in a way that myriad traditional main street banks no longer do.

Excerpts from: http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0921/p01s04-woeu.html

and http://teamsugar.com/group/1950914/blog/2541301

Salaam

Ouadoud


Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 28, 2008 03:07 GMT
Post #163245—in reply to #163242
+0-0
Shiong-Fong Lew
Photo
Mother tongue: English
Joined: Sunday, March 28, 2004
Location: Malaysia
 
RE: Christian Science Monitor reporting about Islamic Finance in Britain
Originally written by Abdelouadoud El Omrani on November 28, 2008 3:34 PM

The land of Adam Smith now teems with a vibrant Islamic banking sector, with even non-Muslims being lured by the model's promise of transparency and stability.

 

I suppose that it's still a willing buyer and willing seller basis. Adam Smith dealt with supply and demand. If there are potential profits to be made out of the Islmaic banking segment, I suppose the banks would consider coming out with the products especially with the Arabs filled up with oil money in recent years.

 

Anyway, I don't suppose the "administrative fee" would be the same for a 100K house and that of a 200K house?

Islamic principles aside (which I'm not interested in questioning), would there be added cost in the title transfer?


Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 28, 2008 06:08 GMT
Post #163254—in reply to #51970
+0-0
Abdelouadoud El Omrani
TC Master
Photo
Expert
200010025
Mother tongues: Arabic, French
Posts: 2127
Joined: Wednesday, February 05, 2003
Location: Qatar
 
RE: Economy
I don't think administrative fees are significant. The banker in the islamic principles is a business entity, a trader. One of its most used tools is Murabaha.

Simplified explanations:
You need a loan to buy a car or a house. The bank buys it and then sells it to you. it makes profit out of material assests, not out of renting or leasing money itsef, since Islamic principles state that money does not produce money by itsef.

You need cash. the bank studies your refunding capacity (mainly the salary, it needs fixed guaranteed income). It may then buy stocks for you (you decide which ones) and it sells them to you. Once you have the stocks, you sell them immediately and you have cash. You pay back in comfortable monthly payments.

There are other tools of course used in Islamic finance, as Islamic insurance for example called Takaful.

Salaam,
Ouadoud



Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Posted:
Friday, November 28, 2008 07:27 GMT
Post #163265—in reply to #163254
+0-0
Shiong-Fong Lew
Photo
Mother tongue: English
Joined: Sunday, March 28, 2004
Location: Malaysia
 
RE: Economy

Originally written by Abdelouadoud El Omrani on November 28, 2008 7:08 PM


You need cash. the bank studies your refunding capacity (mainly the salary, it needs fixed guaranteed income). It may then buy stocks for you (you decide which ones) and it sells them to you. Once you have the stocks, you sell them immediately and you have cash. You pay back in comfortable monthly payments.

 

Shall I assume that the profit sharing ratio had been decided in advance as the asset had already changed hands so that the scheduled payments would not change in a falling interest rate environment (such as presently on a global basis)? Thus the borrower would not have the shceduled repayment reduced, just as not having the repayment increased in a rising interest rate environment?


Reply |Quote |Edit |Delete
Page: 133 34 35 36 37 38 39102
Back
« Thread »
Home | Forums | Search
Recent threads | Today | This Week | Top 25
Forum Statistics | Who's Online | Random Quotes
New TC Mobile | Forum Settings | Log On
TranslatorsCafé.com

Site Language English | Spanish – Español | French – Français | Italian – Italiano | More... | Site Map

Copyright © ANVICA Software Development 2002—2012. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy. Terms and Conditions of Use. Use signifies your agreement.
Mail comments and suggestions to TranslatorsCafe.com webmaster
Directory of translators, interpreters and translation agencies.

Forums Disclaimer: The views expressed in the forums are those of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the site owner and/or moderators. If the reader considers a post to cause offence, then she or he should address a complaint to the moderator of the forum concerned. The complaint should be dealt with within 24 hours, but please respect the fact that the moderator may be living in a different time zone. Use of the forums signifies your agreement with the Forum Posting Rules.