পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 21 নভেম্বর 2008 01.37 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #162516- #162497 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
John B.
মাতৃভাষাঃ ইংরেজী যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 01 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2008 অবস্থানঃ জার্মানী |
RE: Economy
How about an immediate recovery ?
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 21 নভেম্বর 2008 11.06 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #162586- #162516 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
David Kallans
Expert       মাতৃভাষাঃ ইংরেজীপোস্টঃ 17512 যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 13 এপ্রিল 2007 অবস্থানঃ যুক্ত রাস্ট্র |
RE: Economy
Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 1:37 AM How about an immediate recovery ? | This would seem rather unrealistic, and perhaps even undesireable, if the quick recovery is accomplished by continuing to mortgage other generations.
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 21 নভেম্বর 2008 11.14 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #162588- #162516 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
J. K.
মাতৃভাষাঃ পোলিস যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 18 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2003 অবস্থানঃ পোল্যান্ড (removed) |
RE: Economy
Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 7:37 AM How about an immediate recovery ? | Through prayer? | Joseph E. Stiglitz, Nobel Prize laureate in economics, reflects in the business daily Világgazdaság on the global economic crisis. "The world is sinking into an economic crisis that will probably be the worst in the past 25 years, perhaps even the worst since the Great Depression of 1929. In many respects this crisis was 'Made in America'. ... Those who even before the crisis had major trade deficits and high state debts will suffer more than others. States that haven't fully liberalised their capital and financial markets, like China, will be thankful that they didn't give in to pressure from the US Federal Reserve. ... The old institutions recognised the need for reform but they moved at a snail's pace. They did nothing to prevent the current crisis. Then there's the question of how effectively the response of these institutions will be. ... After the Great Depression it took 15 years and a World War for the world to start working as a team and dealing with the weaknesses of the global financial system that had contributed to the crisis. We can only hope that this time it won't take that long: In view of the deeply interwoven nature of the global economy the cost would simply be too high. ... It has become clear that the economic doctrines on which the current Bretton Woods institutions [the World Bank, International Monetary Fund] are based have failed not only in the developing countries, but also in the core countries of capitalism." | | Világgazdaság (Hungary) |
http://europe.courrierinternational.com/eurotopics/article.asp?langue=uk&publication=20/11/2008&cat=REFLECTIONS&pi=0#0
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 21 নভেম্বর 2008 12.59 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #162621- #162588 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
John B.
মাতৃভাষাঃ ইংরেজী যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 01 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2008 অবস্থানঃ জার্মানী |
RE: Economy
Well, it will continue to be bad if they (government) continue to cover any transparency that there might be in the system as to who owns what. It seems like lack of transparency is to me the main issue (example: I am buying a securitized asset, but how do I know what it is worth ?). This is partly the fault of the private sector and banks who intentionally made such securities über-complex so that only they and their PhDs in math could understand them. And many of the most intelligent people in the world STILL don't understand them and what they are worth.
Another problem is "mark to market accounting", which is another rule that means that assets held show a lower value in accounting terms than they are really worth.
The notion that "people should be able to stay in their homes" is misleading. I rent an apartment, but I don't consider it "mine". A house is only "yours" if you can make the payments. The politicians talking this nonsense are just making things worse. In future, people will be more reluctant to sell someone a home if the government backs that person as saying that the house is "theirs", regardless of the ability to pay for it.
Keynesianism - the U.S. government now wants to use old, failed Keynesian "solutions" to solve this problem. The problem is, though, that these "solutions" of giving people more money and letting the economy grow "from the ground up" has been shown not to work. Many times, people sit on the money. That is what the "stimulus check" from Bush was about, by the way. The better solution would be a monetary solution of making the overall business climate better (lower taxes and regulations on business). This worked in 1982-83 to stimulate the biggest world economic expansion of all time, which literally brought 1 billion people out of abject poverty. Monetarism is not the problem, but the solution. When I hear Obama talk Keynesianism, I think, "uh oh".
And now they are taking it one step further and talking about FDR-era public works projects to inject money in the old-fashioned Keynesian way. The problem is, by the time such projects are done, the world is in a different situation, because they take so long. Read about the "Big Dig" in Boston some time and what a waste it was and how over-budget it was.
[John B. কর্তৃক 21 নভেম্বর 2008 13.00 তারিখে এডিট করা হয়েছে]
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 25 নভেম্বর 2008 09.49 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #162986- #162621 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
J. K.
মাতৃভাষাঃ পোলিস যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 18 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2003 অবস্থানঃ পোল্যান্ড (removed) |
RE: Economy
Originally written by John Bunch on November 21, 2008 6:59 PM I am buying a securitized asset, but how do I know what it is worth ? | Generally, in the world of speculators, you don't know. Look at these two pieces of news from the Warsaw Stock Exchange from the last couple of days: 1) Poland’s financial industry regulator on Friday informed the prosecutor’s office about a possible case of market manipulation involving a person acting in the name of JPMorgan Securities. The complaint stems from the unusual end to trading on the Warsaw stock exchange on November 12. The market’s blue-chip WIG20 index had slumped by 9.1 per cent during the day, but minutes before the session’s close a series of buy orders worth 130m zlotys ($42m, €34m, £28m) were executed on all the companies making up the index, driving the WIG20 sharply upwards. It ended the day down 4.93 per cent, and would have closed even higher had the exchange’s circuit breakers designed to dampen wild swings in prices not gone into effect. “Transactions on the account of JPMorgan Securities could have led investors into error,” said a statement from the Financial Supervision Authority. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fa13dd40-b7f1-11dd-ac6d-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1 <script language=JavaScript type=text/JavaScript>function floatContent ( ){} 2 ) Polish oil refiner Lotos denied Monday it is facing bankruptcy as it sought to calm investors unnerved by a Unicredit analyst report which said the company is likely to collapse. Grupa Lotos SA, Poland's second-largest crude oil refiner, said the UniCredit recommendation, released Friday, to sell the company's stock was "entirely without foundation." On Monday, shares fell 20 percent at the start of the trading session, but recovered to close down only 6 percent at 12.72 zlotys ($4.05 ), company spokesman Marcin Zachowicz said. The Polish news agency PAP said the UniCredit report warned that Lotos has only about a 50 percent chance of surviving in its current form. UniCredit also reportedly slashed its target price for Lotos to zero from 25 zlotys ($8.08 ). http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-ap-eu-poland-lotos,0,1458118.story
When you are in the market for shares and minutes before the closing bell someone throws on that market $42 million worth of purchase orders, how much are your target shares worth? And when an analyst issues a report slashing its target price for certain oil stocks you own down to zero (!), how much are they worth? I guess the answer has invariably been: Whatever people are ready to pay... Jacek
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 25 নভেম্বর 2008 09.54 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #162987- #162986 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
J. K.
মাতৃভাষাঃ পোলিস যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 18 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2003 অবস্থানঃ পোল্যান্ড (removed) |
RE: Economy
Y'all cheer up! It's Thanksgiving week! Take part in the usual New Yorker caption contest: - Entries for Contest #171, drawn by Gahan Wilson, will be accepted through Sunday, November 30th.
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 28 নভেম্বর 2008 02.34 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #163242- #51970 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
Abdelouadoud El Omrani TC Master
Expert    মাতৃ ভাষাঃ আরবি, ফরাসিপোস্টঃ 21493 যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 05 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2003 অবস্থানঃ কাতার |
Christian Science Monitor reporting about Islamic Finance in Britain
The land of Adam Smith now teems with a vibrant Islamic banking sector, with even non-Muslims being lured by the model's promise of transparency and stability.
'No interest' gains interest with British MuslimsBy Peter Ford | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor By Ben Quinn | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor from the November 28, 2008 edition London - Shabaz Bhatti is proud to be a devout Muslim – but his plans to remortgage the family home with one of Britain's new generation of Islamic banks isn't just about religion. The 30-something driving instructor wants reliability, and believes Britain's growing Islamic finance sector offers this in a way that myriad traditional main street banks no longer do. Excerpts from: http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0921/p01s04-woeu.html and http://teamsugar.com/group/1950914/blog/2541301 Salaam Ouadoud
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 28 নভেম্বর 2008 03.07 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #163245- #163242 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
Shiong-Fong Lew
মাতৃভাষাঃ ইংরেজী যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 28 মার্চ 2004 অবস্থানঃ মালয়েশিয়া |
RE: Christian Science Monitor reporting about Islamic Finance in Britain
Originally written by Abdelouadoud El Omrani on November 28, 2008 3:34 PM
The land of Adam Smith now teems with a vibrant Islamic banking sector, with even non-Muslims being lured by the model's promise of transparency and stability. | I suppose that it's still a willing buyer and willing seller basis. Adam Smith dealt with supply and demand. If there are potential profits to be made out of the Islmaic banking segment, I suppose the banks would consider coming out with the products especially with the Arabs filled up with oil money in recent years. Anyway, I don't suppose the "administrative fee" would be the same for a 100K house and that of a 200K house? Islamic principles aside (which I'm not interested in questioning), would there be added cost in the title transfer?
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 28 নভেম্বর 2008 06.08 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #163254- #51970 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
Abdelouadoud El Omrani TC Master
Expert    মাতৃ ভাষাঃ আরবি, ফরাসিপোস্টঃ 21493 যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 05 ফেব্রুয়ারী 2003 অবস্থানঃ কাতার |
RE: Economy
I don't think administrative fees are significant. The banker in the islamic principles is a business entity, a trader. One of its most used tools is Murabaha.
Simplified explanations: You need a loan to buy a car or a house. The bank buys it and then sells it to you. it makes profit out of material assests, not out of renting or leasing money itsef, since Islamic principles state that money does not produce money by itsef.
You need cash. the bank studies your refunding capacity (mainly the salary, it needs fixed guaranteed income). It may then buy stocks for you (you decide which ones) and it sells them to you. Once you have the stocks, you sell them immediately and you have cash. You pay back in comfortable monthly payments.
There are other tools of course used in Islamic finance, as Islamic insurance for example called Takaful.
Salaam, Ouadoud
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|
পোস্ট করা হয়েছেঃ 28 নভেম্বর 2008 07.27 জিএমটি-তে | পোস্ট #163265- #163254 এর জবাবে +0-0 |
Shiong-Fong Lew
মাতৃভাষাঃ ইংরেজী যোগ দিয়েছেনঃ 28 মার্চ 2004 অবস্থানঃ মালয়েশিয়া |
RE: Economy
Originally written by Abdelouadoud El Omrani on November 28, 2008 7:08 PM
You need cash. the bank studies your refunding capacity (mainly the salary, it needs fixed guaranteed income). It may then buy stocks for you (you decide which ones) and it sells them to you. Once you have the stocks, you sell them immediately and you have cash. You pay back in comfortable monthly payments.
| Shall I assume that the profit sharing ratio had been decided in advance as the asset had already changed hands so that the scheduled payments would not change in a falling interest rate environment (such as presently on a global basis)? Thus the borrower would not have the shceduled repayment reduced, just as not having the repayment increased in a rising interest rate environment?
|
উত্তর দিন
| দর প্রস্তাব করুন
| এডিট করুন
| মুছুন
|